The Influence of Social Settings on Youth Development and How That Correlates To Crime Rates - Essay Prowess

The Influence of Social Settings on Youth Development and How That Correlates To Crime Rates

The Influence of Social Settings on Youth Development and How That Correlates To Crime Rates

  

The Influence of Social Settings on Youth Development and How That Correlates To Crime Rates

Introduction

The social environment that one is brought up in contributes immensely to the rate and manner through which develops both socially and even economically. An array of trends and demeanor is inherited or fostered in the children and youth as they grow in their neighborhoods. As such, it is at their discretion to respond to the nature of their society as they attempt to survive the moments. From a professional point of understanding, Neighborhoods are the context where the children, as well as, the youths develop. Recent research, from advanced statistical models, as well as, longitudinal studies related to family features argues that neighborhood plays a role in determining the conduct of youth (Leventhal & Brooks-Gunn, 2003). Particularly, the neighborhood has a profound essence particularly in the context of the community social control. A series of attributes through which one develops as a result of the environmental setting include the level of achievement, health conditions and other socioeconomic issues. However, there exist a relationship between these conditions. In this context, the research intends to analyze the relationship between the community or social setting and the development of the youth, particularly regarding the crime rates.

Overview of Social Settings Influences on Youth Development

A social setting comprises the environment that one is brought up it especially in the context of the manner in which the youths develop. A series of neighborhood research argues that the structural or the socio-demographic features often contribute to the extent and the entire child or youth behavioral conducts. Findings from the United States stipulates that factors such as the median house income level, the racial composition, the level of education are some amongst the tract-factors that could contribute to people behaving in a certain way. Most certainly, the youths are mainly affected since they are usually at the helm of the society’s trends. For instance, having been born in a violent society, one tends to embrace that form of life especially in a bid to defend oneself and the next of kin. Therefore, society is likely to maintain a tradition of violence, one that the youth tend to embrace since it is the only provided alternative for survival (Leventhal & Brooks-Gunn, 2003). Quite often, the school is also part of the social setting that could be of influence the development of youth. It is imperative to denote that a social setting is not only liable to cause negative implications on the entire development of the youths. There are incidences where the social setting results in the development of affirmative conduct amongst the youths. The research, however, will determine the rationality of these findings from an economic theorist’s perspective.

An Overview of Thomas Schelling Approach

Thomas’ has had a series of analysis especially in the context of analyzing people’s behavior and conduct in the neighborhoods, as well as, in the context of the international context. However, in this context, the most appropriate approach to Thomas is that of Tipping point, a socio-economic concept (Dixit, 2006). First, the concept attempts to elaborate the roles played by the American neighborhoods in the general development of the people within the society. Usually, a tipping point regards the point in time where a large group of people experiences a rapid alteration of the behavior because of adopting a rare practice that is assumed to have been dissolved. Arguably, the social environment provides a basis for the people existing in it to embrace a common form of behavior. The behavior is likely to spread at a very fast rate considering that every youth in a particular society is already influenced by the threshold of the behavior or does not have an option but to embrace the behavior. According to the theorist, oligopoly in behavior lead to a wide spread of the same from one generation to the other. That means that the kind of trend that was embraced from a historical perspective is usually passed on to the next generations. The youths are usually the most likely victims of these trends in the society.

An Assessment of a Contemporary Trend Regarding Social Environment and Youth Development Considering the Tipping Point Approach

First, in a bid to elevate the level of understanding of the argument that the social setting of any community influences the development of the youths, it is imperative to select an example of an area that has had an experience with this issue. For instance, the New York neighborhood is a perfect example of a scenario where the social setting. Particularly, the city has a historical reputation of crime. The imperative section of this research is to ascertain the extent in which the crime rate in the city is associated with the social setting and how this has been passed on from one people to the other considering the arguments stipulated by the Thomas in his concept of Tipping Point (Dixit, 2006).

First, in a case study regarding the gun violence crisis amongst the youths in the New York City, there has been prevalent crimes most of which have been perpetrated by the youths. From a historical perspective, the city is famous for the experiences it has in the unprecedented, as well as, sustained crime rate for the last twenty-five to thirty years. That means that that the society has a tendency to crimes. In fact, the area was once considered to be a war zone. However, the social setting is responsible for this. In a bid to analyze the issue at hand, the approach of tipping point is also very relevant. An analysis of the crimes in the New York City shows that there has been youth gun related violence, as well as, crew activities (Ueberall & Cannon, 2015).  However, the development of the youths to being criminals in the city is influenced by the renowned violent turf rivalries that occur between the less organized youths and the strong, as well as, legendary gangs (Leventhal & Brooks-Gunn, 2003). That means that the youths tend to embrace the trend in an involuntary way. They engage the traditional gangs first in their self-defense. However, it is not a wonder to find that the youths turn out to be violent criminals too.

From a tipping point approach, the behavioral change amongst the youth emanates from the historical trends by the youths in the New York City (Ueberall & Cannon, 2015). The criminal behavior is inherited from one age to the other all because it is a characteristic of the social setting. Hence, the social environment is a crucial facilitator in the development of the demeanor and conduct of the youths.

Conclusion

Accordingly, it is indisputable that the social setting influences the development of the youths. The Tipping point approach enhances the understanding of this issues from a theoretical perspective. Particularly, the youths tend to adopt what the precedent youths are used to doing. Hence, their behavior is part of what is influenced by the social environment.

References

Ueberall, S., & Cannon, A. (2015). Assessing New York City’s Youth Gun Violence Crisis: Crews. Responding to the Problem coordinating a continuum of services.

 Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). Children and youth in neighborhood contexts. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 27-31.

Dixit, A. (2006). Thomas Schelling’s contributions to game theory. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 108(2), 213-229.