Rationales for Punishment
Punishment refers to an action issued by an authority that imposes a difficulty to either a person or group of people in response to the crime that they have committed. This measure is subjected deliberately to the party that has led to the presence of a consequence, which is undesirable to the society (Miethe, and Lu, 2005). The primary objective of issuing this deliberate action is to help minimize the chances of that person or group repeating the unwanted outcome (Griset, 1991). It involves subjecting the person responsible for the offense with an unpleasant or painful action because of wrongdoing or breaking the laid down regulations.
Application of Rationale for Punishment
Several rationales for punishment are usually used in correcting or lowering the probability of an offense being committed by an individual or a group of persons. The first rationale is retribution. This reasoning seeks to inflict unpleasant consequences to a person or group responsible for an offense because they deserve to be done so (Miethe, and Lu, 2005). The behavior of criminals disturbs the peaceful co-existence and equilibrium of the society, and punishment plays a crucial role in bringing back the balance.
Retribution tends to concentrate on the criminal law itself as the primary objective why the adverse action is being imposed. Those who do wrong and inflict suffering to others ought to be subjected to the same because they have resulted to other people experiencing adverse outcome and pain. According to one Griset, (1991), retribution philosophy firmly grips that the intensity of an authoritative. Deliberate action inflicted to a particular person or a group of people should solemnly be related to how worse the offense is (Pollock, 2012). The theory also argues that the act of a country punishing those who commit various offenses helps to bring satisfaction