Coaching and mentoring Theory and practice Essay - Essay Prowess

Coaching and mentoring Theory and practice Essay


Kindly add to CART and buy this product for only $5.







I would like to acknowledge the efforts of those who have made this research successful. Specifically, I would like to acknowledge the help form my tutor [Name], who guided me to conduct this research. I could not have done it better without my tutor’s advice and guidance. I would also like to appreciate the input of my fellow students who gave deeper insights regarding the choice of the organization as well as ways to conduct a coaching and mentoring research. Special thanks to my friends and family who supported me while doing the research through words of encouragement and assistance in one way or another.

Executive Summary

This paper explores all aspects of internal coaching and mentoring. It focuses on Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) as an organization that has tried to implement contemporary management strategies that incorporate internal coaching and mentoring of employees for the purposes of improving performance and profitability of the organization. However, coaching and mentoring has been done through traditional training methods at ADIA.

 Coaching is the process of creating short-term task-based skills while mentoring is more creating a long-term relationship that improves personal and professional skills. For this reason, this research concentrates on internal coaching and mentoring which can be considered short-term and long-term professional development. It incorporates the worker’s capacity to work competently, improving their confidence and fearlessness and inspiration to develop and exceed expectations. Now and again, coaching is done through formal programs or informally when employees are guided by their line managers to do certain tasks or to approach projects in particular ways.


This paper focuses on all aspects of internal coaching and mentoring with specific concentration on how ADIA conducts coaching and mentoring of its employees. In the recent past, researchers have discovered that employee coaching and mentoring can improve their performance hence increasing the productivity of an organization while reducing employee turnover. Essentially, coaching and mentoring can increase job satisfaction among employees. A mentor’s main employment is to help their employee reveal the appropriate response, or another and diverse method for working all the more successfully, inside themselves. ADIA has been improving the skills of its employees through traditional training. However, the organization is planning to create an internal coaching program. The proposed program is intended to offer learning opportunities and transfer knowledge to employees.

The key contrast between coaching and mentoring is that coaching does not try to determine the more profound fundamental issues that are the reason for major issues like poor inspiration, low confidence and poor employment performance. Mentoring increases employee motivation and aligns them to the organization culture. Doing this requires undivided attention as well as simple skills. This can be challenging since research shows that employees are inspired by coaching and mentoring (Finnerty, 2008). This does not take into account the kind of profundity and understanding that is expected to engage a coaching and mentoring. In this paper, it is demonstrated that coaching helps managers to create new culture in organization by coachin g and mentoring employees. The role of a manager is to oversee that coaching and mentoring are just a vehicle for the improvement of employees’ skills and their personal and professional approach to work.

Coaching and mentoring projects are by and large more focused on the handy issues of setting objectives and accomplishing comes about in particular time-scales. Building organizational and personal skills is vital in making a solid internal coaching program. Once the convictions are set up, the following stride are built and refined through the abilities of workers who will fill in as coaches and mentors in the future (Frazee, 2008).

Research Questions

  1. How does internal coaching and mentoring impact on ADIA?
  2. What is the level of resistance of to changes in the organization in terms of coaching?
  3. What is the availability of resources in terms of time, ability to deliver message, determination?

Literature Review

Coaching and mentoring have been seen as important strategy for personal and professional development of employees.  Additionally, coaching and mentoring have noteworthy benefit to the association. As illustrated by Lord (2010), coaching and mentoring are meant to challenge employees and executive staff to keep learning and improve their personal and professional skills. Staffs who acknowledge their duties and responsibilities are better engaged to improve their performance as well as that of an organization are well suited to the mentoring and coaching program. Therefore, the whole purpose of internal coaching and mentoring is to create the sense of open-mindedness among employees (Lord, 2010). Coaching then again is not by and large performed on the premise that the mentor has coordinate understanding of their organization. This is only possible if unless the coaching is particular and abilities centered (Frost, 2007).

In the past, coaching and mentoring were only meant for senior managers and other executive members of an organization. Today, coaching and mentoring is accessible to all as an expert or self-awareness technique. Coaching and mentoring are likewise firmly connected to the organizational structure and culture (Clutterbuck, 2008). All in all, the end goal is to help staff to acknowledge and adjust to changes in a way reliable with their own qualities and objectives.

Many employees may not realize the purpose of coaching and mentoring. Particularly with regards to the time needed for coaching and mentoring, employees feel that it is taking their time. While it is vital, employees frequently tend to incline toward overseeing what might facilitate proficient advancement for most workers, particularly executives.

The immediate and long term advantages are determined by the performance of employees in terms of productivity and the entire organization in terms of profitability. However, there are clear evaluation techniques on the effect of coaching on the executives who work as internal mentors and coaches (Yedreshteyn, 2008). Regardless of whether there is any noteworthy change seen in the leadership styles of these executives, recent trends have proved that coaching and mentoring is important to reduce employee turnover. This is accomplished by these executives who also seek improvement by coaching and mentoring employees internally.

Changes as a result of mergers and acquisitions must be followed by coaching and mentoring to ensure that employees are oriented towards the direction of the merged company. In such situations, coaching and mentoring should be done by bringing employees from two organizations together so that they can learn from each other in process of coaching and mentoring (Nyman & Thach, 2002).  Internal coaching is ending up noticeably progressively prevalent as coaching and mentoring keeps on developing. It bodes well for several reasons that keep on underlying its essence. One of the reasons is the fact that it increases the profits from a constrained spending plan. This makes it conceivable to convey the estimation of coaching to more individuals over the association. It takes advantage of and uses the coaching potential from inside the association.

An organization will get two benefits since future coaches and mentors are developed in the process of internal coaching and mentoring. It likewise quickens ability advancement with an all the more by and by centered approach. Internal coaching and mentoring can be better than external coaching and mentoring. However, doing it internally can be more intimate and at lower costs (Klopfenstein, 2007).

In spite of the fact that internal mentoring has certainly developed in popularity, it still needs improvement (Sisson, 2014). Its use in the course of recent years is an essential support structure that has the effect to the achievement and nature of any coaching and/or mentoring program. These incorporate the plan and set-up, enrollment, coordinating, training and improvement dedicated programs. When you know who is playing out the part of mentor you then need to choose whether or not the coaching ought to be directed in a formal or casual way. Coaching and mentoring should be possible using proficient coaching services. These services can be provided by ADIA managers internally.  Internally, it can be done by the management themselves or by another person in the organization.

There is an expanding pattern for people to assume more noteworthy liability for their own and expert advancement. Recently, even the individuals who are used in vast associations are no longer depending on businesses to give them all or their profession improvement needs. In the recent past the number of people seeking assistance from the management for internal coaching and mentoring has been increasing. Some are searching for a career change. On the other hand, others are trying to augment their potential with a current manager or accomplish more prominent adjustments with their work and personal lives (Parsloe & Wray, 2000).

The association between the mentor and employee needs to make enhanced aptitudes and information that can be fused into the way of life and procedures of the association. Coaching and mentoring can likewise discharge the potential for development and readiness required in today’s quickly evolving condition. For instance, for the employee’s thoughts to be received the association may need to roll out noteworthy and expensive improvements to one of their frameworks (Lindbom, 2007). Expanded adjustment and responsiveness can be set up through coaching and mentoring. Based on recent trends, coaching and mentoring improve the confidence of employees on the management’s willingness to help them.

As demonstrated by Frazee (2008), coaching helps an employee get the best performance out of the process. It increases the potential for which was at that point there. Coaches and mentors can give an impartial confidence and guarantee to add up to privacy. As for organizational coaching mentoring, there is no plan other than helping their mentees in their advancement and to achieve their objectives. Viable coaching is expected to help employees to learn instead of training through formal methods. By drawing in with an accomplished mentor, employees will create bits of knowledge prompting improved viability.


The design of the research was guided by the management of the organization. For this reason, 50% of the organization management was dedicated to coaching junior employees so as they can develop their career in their first two years in the organization. ADIA research included the organization’s Talent and Development Section of the UAE National Development and the Year One Program. The program comes at the Early Career phase of UAE Nationals the appraisal. The program included training existing senior employees to advance their careers. Then again, senior employees were challenged to improve their performance. The research used a cross-sectional research design as a quantitative research design strategy. To assess the circumstance of the study, each part of the research program was evaluated independently.

The sampling technique was utilized for ADIA’s UAE national populace for the most part and the examining comprising of an adjustment of quantitative and subjective strategies. A straightforward arbitrary approach was pertinent as the division was at that point distinguished in gatherings for the gathering which had similar attributes on a similar level. The techniques were particularly a joining of meetings and studies relying upon the classifications analyzed. Information was accumulated through surveys and meetings focusing on both subjective and quantitative information. They were distinctive in office importance and alluded to the graduating the program. The other gathering was resolved through various divisions.

Data Collection

A simple random approach will be significant as the division is as of now distinguishes in gatherings for the ECD aggregate which have similar qualities on a similar level however are diverse in office pertinence and where they will allude to in the wake of graduating the program, the other gathering will be resolved through various offices, residency and status in review age is additionally a viewpoint that will be thought about with inspecting bunches for the poll.

A simple random approach was utilized to gather information through meetings and polls. A subjective technique was utilized as a part of meeting plan that included a pioneer Human Resources, one Senior in an Investment Department and a Business Partner.

The HR manager helped the researcher to collect data about workers. The HR Business Partner gave a target see on abilities of the division, their necessities and capability of improving information. Then again, the Investment Department pioneer proposed the correct purposes of material and a criterion that was tended to in a tutoring program from a speculation require perspective. Keeping in mind the end goal to diminish examining mistakes a likelihood inspecting, a stratified arbitrary testing in which tests were fragmented relying upon divisions, experience, residency and age was utilized. This was done to acquire strata layers of levels in chose possibility for the review in the isolation of the populace.


Quantitative Analysis

From the results obtained through the research, 45% of the respondents were in the investment sector while the rest (55%) were in the non-investment segment of ADIA (mean=10 and median=7). 45% of the 20 respondents agreed that line manager had a clear development plan for employee with measurable objectives. This can be compared to the 25% who agreed that the development plan for employee was mutual while 30% highly agreed with this. Therefore, creating abilities in employees is significantly more than exchanging information or showing work aptitudes to help them in playing out their part successfully. It is important as a device to support people who are as a rule optimized or quickened into more senior influential positions, especially as it can concentrate on building up the entire individual and has a more extensive calculated focal point than coaching.

Out of the 38 senior employees, who have taken an interest in this intercession of internal coaching, 19 could at last meet the base benchmark for confirmation. Out of the rest of the managers, 10 managers couldn’t finish the stipulated 12 sessions before the appraisal, 2 supervisors could mentor just two employees and the rest of not meet the evaluation criteria. Based on the research results, 92.5% of ADIA employees agreed that coaching and mentoring are important in learning from training program at the workplace. This translates to a mean of 36.65.

As indicated by the research, 35% of respondents attributed their future in ADIA to strong management. Out of the 20 respondents, (mean=7, mode=7, and media=7) average of 7 respondents attributed their future to strong management. This number was similar to that of those who attributed their future in ADIA to a clear career path. On the other hand, 30% of the 20 respondents indicated that good working environment is the reason they considered working for ADIA in the future. Recognizing coaching and mentoring parameters in advance will help direct you toward the sorts of coaching and mentoring programs that will work for your organization. We would say, many ability advancement programs use both techniques. One organization may give their high potential individuals with a guide; others will supplement this with a mentor or guarantee the individual’s line supervisor is giving vigorous coaching support to them. The blends are various and the most ideal approach to consolidate coaching and mentoring relies on upon the leadership setting, culture and sense of duty regarding these instruments (Nigro, 2009).

Internal coaches, by and large, have the upside of understanding the organization’s business issues and internal progression. This can be illustrated by the results of the research which showed that 35% of employees have worked between 2 and 5 years at ADIA (mean=5, mode=5 and median=5). They know about the employee’s specific situation and they talk the dialect of the organization. If internal coaches are fruitful managers then they may think that it is less demanding to pick up the regard of the employees and assemble compatibility. A few organizations offer a support and a tutor, or a support and an outside mentor. However, they may have less coaching and cross-leadership experience when contrasted with outside coaches. In internal coaching, when the mentor is a pioneer, coaching different employees in the organization, may have a favorable position (Sisson, 2014).

Coaches and mentors look for signs which may show that a customer requires an evaluation by a prepared specialist. Concentrating administrators on their coaching abilities and making them convey formal coaching, regardless of the possibility that it is just for one hour seven days, has a wide systemic effect in all cases. Some coaches will on-allude a customer to a proper advisor if this is felt to be valuable. Other coaches will lead a coaching program in parallel with a helpful intercession.

Qualitative Analysis

As indicated by the research, 40% of the 20 respondents (ADIA employees) have learned professional skills form their line manager. Only 25% of the employees have gained technical skills form their line manager (mean=5, median=5). Possibly, not just the individual being honed profits by the relationship additionally the administrator who is coaching likewise picks up. Instructing managers to mentor is not just financially savvy for manageable long term leadership advantages, yet there are profound advantages as far as their own and expert additions.

In instructive settings, when pioneers mentor pioneers, learning and educating are constantly traded in a righteous instructing cycle. This makes arrangement and vitality for the organization’s qualities, vision and procedure even as it produces the new administration fundamental for what’s to come. Most coaches and guides are quick to keep up the expert limits between coaching and mentoring and the customary treatments and will team up with advisors when a customer requires this type of intercession (Fairweather, Cramond & Landis, 2015).

It is normal for the coaching and mentoring to be used while making it less demanding for customers to discover specialist cooperation who take a mental concentration in their work. It was unrealistic for the organization to procure an expansive number of external coaches for advancement of capabilities for potential leaders at the center management level. The top management of the ADIA, in this way, connected with an internal staff proposed to create a coaching program to enhance abilities among the senior management group in the organization (Carnell, MacDonald & Askew, 2012).

The essential targets of the activity were to create internal coaches from senior administration unit to guarantee long haul progression of the coaching activity, improvement of in-house competency and building a coaching culture. The order for the mentor was to lead coaching aptitude training for the senior administration group, make a procedure of coaching for these trained supervisors, encourage and support these chiefs when they attempt the coaching part. The researcher was driving this activity as an interested party for the benefit of the firm. Finally, the firm expected to assess the viability of the coaching done by these trained supervisors for a stipulated period.

The primary purpose of the organization use internal coaches is that they do not have the intention of hiring an external mentor or coach. The mentoring and coaching program was proposed in view of the experiential procedure of adapting new abilities and concentrating on changing the outlook of overseeing training within the organization. This involved aiding and encouraging the employees for self-learning and mindfulness. One of the basic parameters of accomplishment of any internal coaching is the trust level between the internal mentor and the employee.

Coaching projects are custom-made particularly to the individual, their insight, experience, development and desire. This is by and large focused on accomplishing various targets for both the individual and the organization. Additionally, as the employee’s immediate manager, there is need to help them in the coaching and mentoring process. This gives you the chance to become more acquainted with them well, while you construct and show an establishment of shared trust and regard. These targets regularly incorporate the individual having the capacity to perform particular, all around characterized errands while considering the individual and profession improvement needs of the person (Carnell, MacDonald & Askew, 2012).

The effect of coaching and mentoring programs in ADIA is demonstrated. Nonetheless, viably dealing with these projects can even now be a test. Manual administration utilizing spreadsheets is not successful or adaptable. Moreover, in light of the fact that you are always cooperating with your group you will have many chances to impact them than an outside advisor would have. This may not be so pertinent if the internal mentor is somebody outside of the group or office, unless the mentor is now in successive contact on account of the way of the action itself (Garvey, Stokes & Megginson, 2014).

In this research, managers were to mentor three center managers for 6 weeks, after they came back to the working environment. Choice of employees was basic in this intervention, since the supervisors were extremely senior in the progressive system of the organization. Many administrators in ADIA could have picked to get associated with these senior managers or the prepared supervisors may have chosen the employee in light of their own solace level.

Personal or life coaching services have developed altogether in the United Arab Emirates over the previous decade. Individual coaches may work eye to eye yet email and phone based connections are additionally extremely normal. At ADIA, traditional training is conducted by internal personnel such as managers. These coaches and mentors work in profoundly steady parts to the individuals who wish to roll out some type of noteworthy improvement in their lives (Slingsby, 2009).

During the coaching stage, while the prepared chiefs instructed three center level managers for six to nine months, the internal mentor encouraged the procedure and gave contributions to the internal coaches when they confronted barricades or did not know of the coaching procedure. It can likewise bring you and the organization huge advantages. A standout amongst the impact coaching can have on the confidence of your group. Demonstrating that you esteem your group enough to invest energy coaching them to build up their own abilities and potential in regards to certainty (David, Clutterbuck & Megginson, 2016).

Coaching and mentoring are not new at ADIA. They have been done traditionally when the organization felt that there was need to improve the skills of its employees. These projects have helped organizations throughout the years create and hold ability. In any case, generally these projects have just been offered to the couple of because of the regulatory expenses of creating and running these projects. Coaching is not an instance of ‘surrendering’ your time and vitality to help other people accomplish their objectives and take care of their issues. With the new instruments, ROI research, and master assets accessible today, organizations now have more noteworthy chance to use these projects. To senior pioneers, as well as scale them over the organization emphatically influence worker vocation development, engagement, and maintenance at all levels.

Toward the finish of the coaching travel, the chiefs experienced many appraisal forms, which incorporated the assessment of coaching results, successful organization of coaching abilities, perception of coaching sessions by internal mentor and criticism from the employees. Coaches offer their customers a strong and spurring condition to investigate what they need in life and how they may accomplish their goals and satisfy their requirements. The mentor’s key part is frequently is helping the customer to keep up the inspiration and duty expected to accomplish their objectives. By helping the customer in resolving to activity and by being a sounding-board to their encounters, coaching permits the individual space and support they have to develop (Garvey, Stokes & Megginson, 2014).

The openness and acknowledgment of others’ thoughts and deduction enhances the working connections in ADIA. The synergistic way of these connections makes individuals feel engaged and makes an air of trust and trustworthiness. Such properties will directly affect the performance of the person and in addition the group. The long haul advantages of putting your own particular time in creating and coaching your colleagues can be significant. Your group will turn out to be more independent, empowering you to delegate undertakings with certainty and concentrate your abilities and time on the larger amount errands that no one but you can perform (Frazee, 2008).

The relational style stock outcomes showed that chiefs’ viability in utilizing utilitarian practices had enhanced and additionally the showing the practices of employees is dependent on the management. These outcomes showed that there is a positive move in the administrative styles of these pioneer coaches. This brought about a falling impact of progress of practices inside the organization. Toward the finish of the coaching and accreditation handle, a composed overview and balanced collaboration with the internal mentor were led among the guaranteed manager coaches to comprehend the effect of the coaching travel.

When leaders embrace a stronger and helping part for the improvement of their subordinates, they used a more addressing methodology as opposed to the telling and coordinating methodology. One of the study inquiries was, “What do you think you have picked up actually and by what method will it profit you in your expert and individual life?” The reactions of the ensured manager coaches were broke down to comprehend what they accepted to be the increases from this attempt.

Coaching and mentoring can be sorted as the procedure contemplations. An early question to answer is the degree and size of the coaching that will be accessible. A major risk of internal coaching is that it winds up plainly unsustainable. Frequently this is on account of there is inadequate limit inside the mentor pool. Subsequently, it’s ideal to begin little and construct continuously. Another advantage with this approach is that you can resolve little issues effectively and rapidly.


The challenges for high performing organizations such as ADIA are the intense deficiencies of powerful pioneers, the capacity to draw in pioneers from outside and the maintenance of the skillful pioneers. Unless you’re extremely blessed and have a practically boundless spending plan, your coaches will have a normal everyday employment. Coaching is a standout amongst the best devices in building initiative limit inside the organization. To assemble authority, a successful administration improvement process is required, where the accentuation is on creating initiative abilities among high potential supervisors.

As a rule, coaching is done by the specific circumstance and the concentration of the program. This examination highlights that employees are not just ones to determine immediate and circuitous advantages, the manager coaches too enhance their leadership abilities, relational aptitudes and work-life adjustments. Business coaching is constantly done considering the limitations put on the individual or group in the leadership setting. Individual coaching then again is taken altogether from the individual’s point of view (Finnerty, 2008).

Trust is a sensitive blossom; it can thrive just when the mentor can make the correct condition by showing an abnormal state of trustworthiness, genuineness, openness, decency and regard. Leadership ability may not give coaching and mentoring program work processes to help direct these projects. The mentor training program, in this way, managed completely with the significance of having or not having trust in the coaching relationship and investigated how best to fabricate that trust. Clutterbuck (2008) proposes that if the coaching procedure has been done successfully, skillfully and professionally, there is a sensible desire that the performance of the employee will make strides. The second vital part of planning the mentor training program was to prepare the senior administrators in both life coaching and performance coaching aptitudes. The blend of business or performance objectives with individual objectives can possibly have a huge effect on their work performance (Garvey, Stokes & Megginson, 2014).

The exact review demonstrated that they enhanced their relational aptitudes, listening capacity, work-life adjust and there was additionally a stamped change in their fearlessness. These chiefs likewise detailed that their vision was expanded and that they were more powerful in managing between individual issues.

Any internal mentor must be able to adjust their correspondences style to that most suited to this action. Another issue that can bring about issues for internal coaches is the obstruction of their own undertaking weights, which may keep them from having sufficient energy they need so as to direct coaching appropriately. The mentor must have the capacity to surrender control for joint effort and, through cautious and well thoroughly considered addressing, to draw out an answer from the employee. These weights may drive the mentor to take control back, or imply that they don’t have room schedule-wise to investigate the issue or issue confronting the employee and guide the employee to think about a determination.

The impediment of this research is that the quantities of coaches required in this intervention are somewhat little and every one of them is from a similar organization. The last key zone for thought is the determination and training of coaches. Not everybody is a decent mentor – even with exhaustive training. Notwithstanding, the relational style stock outcomes exhibited that adequacy on utilizing useful practices had enhanced or potentially the show of broken practices of supporting or basic parent, or versatile self-image states were lessened. Choosing how you will choose coaches is vital. We prescribe looking for volunteers yet being evident that they will experience a choice procedure. This technique will disclose to you who is persuaded and quick to be a mentor.

Quite a bit of this will be managed by the contemplations laid out above. Investigate our case studies to perceive how we’ve assisted with both introductory mentor training and ceaseless expert advancement for internal coaches.

These outcomes showed that there is a change in adequacy of the administrative styles of these manager-coaches. It mirrors that they received a stronger and helping part for the improvement of their subordinates, they used an all the more addressing methodology set up of the telling and coordinating methodology. Once you’ve chosen your coaches, watchful thought must be given to their training and afterward their proceeded with support and continuous advancement.

Many managers conduct for coaching or mentoring for performance improvement as opposed to the correction of an performance issue. At the point when an organization is paying premium rates for improvement administrations, performance is typically the key pay-back they are searching for. Regardless of the possibility that an official or chief gets support in adjusting work and home life, it will be with the point of expanding their viability and efficiency at work and not for more benevolent reasons.

Internal coaching is not done in all performance improvement circumstances, particularly considering leadership multifaceted nature, privacy and different variables. Coaching and mentoring have been appeared to be exceptionally fruitful intercession in these cases. Notwithstanding, it is a hearty branch of official coaching world and is getting to be plainly well known. In these examples coordinated aptitudes coaching permits an adaptable, versatile ‘in the nick of time’ way to deal with abilities advancement.

Jobs are changing at an expanding rate. Conventional training projects are regularly excessively unyielding or bland, making it impossible to manage these quick moving prerequisites. In extensive organizations, where administrators are occupied with coaching their subordinates, a coaching capacity is gradually incorporated with ADIA through falling. It is likewise conceivable to apply aptitudes coaching in live situations as opposed to removing individuals from the occupation into a learning environment where it is less simple to mimic the employment condition.



A Leader in HR
1 What are the strength and weaknesses in the ECD programs that are currently in place in ADIA?
The strengths is represented through the chance of giving the early career employees and the best place to fit in by develop their skills to reach the level needed from ADIA to fit in the rols, also building a large network so they feel comfortable fitting in smoothly after the year one program. The weaknesses are reflected in the academic system that is in place that has the characteristics of a school system rather than a work environment.
2 How knowledge transfer ADIA is managed?
Through networking and building relationships and panels that are in place semi weekly forums that allows individuals to be updated and interact. Besides the training courses that are provided internally and externally to enhance knowledge.
3 How often is interaction with EC employees and how does that affect them positively or negatively?
On daily basis as it effects them positively by feeling comfort and support and providing them with guidance and solving their issues ensures that
4 How much affect will a coaching program  will have if introduced and from which group resistance is suspected (EC, Managers or committees) ?
Affect is very high as the new generation (millennials ) need more support and encouragement to learn and progress and innovate in their job. The difficulty will mainly occur from manager when threat might be the message that is sent but it can be maintained and change can be managed through managing expectations and communicating the right message
5 What is the best methods to educate on the job learning in ADIA in groups or individually and how can the process be managed?
It might be effective to start with small groups of three/four early career employees with a mentor for short periods at a daily basis that will ensure the learn on thing at a time and engage with a leader/manager, this will increase their sense of encouragement with the support of this leader
6 How much time can a senior employee invest in a coaching/mentoring program?
This in opinion is the most difficult part of a coaching program where we might find difficulties in finding time on leaders/managers schedule to sit down and conduct a coaching session where the suggested small groups in shorter periods of time will be the most appropriate to conduct.
A Senior Level in Investment Department
What are the strength and weaknesses in the ECD programs that are currently in place in ADIA?
• From my perspective the strength of the ECD program is to help us monitor the participants and their progress. It helps us evaluate the weaknesses and strengths of an individual so we can enhance or help develop that individual.
• We consider investing in the local talent program as the largest investment adia holds, since they are the future of not only Adia but the whole country. Those ECD programs gives the key to those individual to become the future leaders
• However, with the key by itself, its not enough to make a difference in this rapidly growing industry. It has to be accompanied by a lot of hard work and the will to learn and develop.
• From my point of you, one of the  weaknesses of ECD is how reliant the participants become to it, it takes away from the individuals sense of independent.
How knowledge transfer ADIA is managed?
• In a massive organization, knowledge transfer will always be an issue. However ADIA always ensures that transparency within adia internally (within a limit) is very important, and this is through the endless seminars and discussions happening around the organizations as well as the technological advances that helps the employees communicate with each other with ease.
How often is interaction with EC employees and how does that affect them positively or negatively?
• As often as possible, the EC employees should feel welcomed as an important part of a team. This gives them the sense of belonging as well as the confidence needed for them to start developing their skills.
How much affect will a coaching program will have if introduced and from which group resistance is suspected (EC, Managers or committees) ?
• I believe that you can coach a person for as hard as you want and still see no difference; I think the main difference lies on each EC employee’s ability and eagerness to learn. Coaching programs will make those EC employees reliant, I believe in making my EC employees feel like any other employee where they have to do similar projects, missions and presentations and learn from their mistakes and only seek help when it is needed from any member of the team.
What is the best methods to educate on the job learning in ADIA in groups or individually and how can the process be managed?
• In my opinion the best method is our fathers method, which means giving the individual the responsibility to seek help where help is needed and work so hard to prove your commitment to ADIA, rather than just relying on other employees to teach everything. Being a future leader does not require knowledge on its own, it requires a strong and social personality that goes a long with this knowledge.
• The management has to be hands on providing everything the individual seeks and giving back constant feedback and appraisals.
How much time can a senior employee invest in a coaching/mentoring program?
• Having a mentor is very helpful indeed, however I don’t believe in “spoon feeding” as they say. I believe that when an individual needs help, he should be able to communicate to any employee around him for assistance and guidance. Sticking to one certain mentor will narrow down that individual’s social circle as well as his ability to learn from different perspectives. I don’t think there should be a specific timing for mentoring, I encourage the young employees to definitely seek help, however I would rather them have the transparency within the whole team and not just reliant on one mentor.
Business Partner
What are the strength and weaknesses in the ECD programs that are currently in place in ADIA?
We work alongside each department to create a program which helps equip each EC employee with the necessary skills to thrive in their department. The strengths are that the time and work we have put in to organizing these programs have had a lot of impact on EC employees and we have seen so much progress. The downsides are, the time it takes to gather and implement new structures, communicating and reaching deadlines are another downside.
How knowledge transfer ADIA is managed?
In my department, for EC employees it would be through rotation and shadowing senior employees. As they will not all have the chance to spend 1 month with each senior employee, we have set up meetings with different senior employees for the EC employee to meet to answer any questions. As well as, sending them to attend conferences and seminars offsite and preparing a detailed report.  As a division, we meet twice a week to discuss and update each other on happenings of each department giving us a chance to cooperate and communicate in union.
How often is interaction with EC employees and how does that affect them positively or negatively?
In my department, I have daily interactions with our EC employees and biweekly official meetings.
How much affect will a coaching program will have if introduced and from which group resistance is suspected (EC, Managers or committees) ?
Here in ADIA, its own mission is to generate economic returns for the benefit of future generations. EC employees are the future of ADIA, helping them in any way, like introducing a coaching program would further increase their knowledge and develop their skills as profession employees. I don’t think any group would resist it.
What is the best methods to educate on the job learning in ADIA in groups or individually and how can the process be managed?
In every job learning, there should be a proper structure, set out guidelines and frameworks clear for the employee to implement. Making sure that structure is evolving and adaptable, open to customization to each individual’s needs.
As well as having time to reflect with the individual on a weekly or biweekly basis, catching up on their performance and giving feedback. Advising them to keep a journal of their daily work activities.
Individually, I would say, it’s for the EC employee to shadow senior employees, have a daily catch up to talk things out make sure they are well informed, encourage them to ask questions, create objectives for them and have monthly presentations to test the EC employee on their knowledge.
How much time can a senior employee invest in a coaching/mentoring program?
I think it’s very important to dedicate time in a mentoring program, because it not only helps EC employees  to gain insight on the daily activities of a senior employee but it’s also beneficial for the mentor to have a fresh perspective and learn from the EC employee as well. What I mean to say is that it is not a one way street, that’s why I make sure that it’s one of my main priorities to have a 15 min catch up with the EC employee every morning. In addition to a biweekly 30-45min meeting to discuss performance and share comments of the EC employees program.


Anonymous (2008). New Global Study Tackles What Really Works When It Comes to Coaching Employees. US Fed News Service, Including US State News.

Baron, L. and Morin, L., (2010). The impact of executive coaching on self-efficacy related to management soft-skills. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(1), pp. 18-38.

Top of Form

Carnell, E., MacDonald, J., & Askew, S. (2012). Coaching and Mentoring in Higher Education: A learning-centred approach. London: Institute of Education Press.

Bottom of Form

Clutterbuck, D., (2008). What’s happening in coaching and mentoring? And what is the difference between them? Development and Learning in Organizations, 22(4), pp. 8-10.

Top of Form

David, S. A., Clutterbuck, D., & Megginson, D. (2016). Beyond goals: Effective strategies for coaching and mentoring. London: Routledge.

Bottom of Form

Fairweather, E.C., Cramond, B. & Landis, R.N., (2015). Are creativity tests susceptible to coaching? Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), pp. 177-182.

Finnerty, M., (2008). Section IV: Face-to-Face Delivery-As Important as Ever – Chapter 21: Coaching: A Customized Learning Approach. Alexandria: Association for Talent Development.

Frazee, R.V., (2008). E -coaching in organizations: A study of features, practices, and determinants of use, University of San Diego.

Frost, J., (2007). In-house coaching and mentoring. Training Journal, , pp. 52-55.

Top of Form

Garvey, B., Stokes, P. M., & Megginson, D. (2014). Coaching and mentoring: Theory and practice. Los Angeles, Calif. [u.a.: SAGE.

Bottom of Form

Gurchiek, K., (2016). Should Your Organization Use Internal Coaches? HRNews, .

Klopfenstein, T.W., (2007). Analysis of an organization’s need for a coaching program, Northcentral University.

Lindbom, D., (2007). A Culture of Coaching: The Challenge of Managing Performance for Long-Term Results. Organization Development Journal, 25(2), pp. P101-P106.

Lord, E.G., (2010). A quantitative study on executive coaching from a learning transfer perspective, University of Phoenix.

Maceachern, M., (2003). Impact of positive coaching on employee engagement, Royal Roads University (Canada).

Martin, K., (2006), May 15. Coaching in the corporate world. Niagara Falls Review, A5. ISSN 08391572.

Top of Form

Nigro, N. J. (2009). The everything coaching and mentoring book: Increase productivity, foster talent, and encourage success. Cincinnati: F+W Media, Inc.

Bottom of Form

Nyman, M. & Thach, L., (2002). Coaching as a new leadership development option. SuperVision, 63(9), pp. 3-6.

Top of Form

Parsloe, E., & Wray, M. (2000). Coaching and mentoring: Practical methods to improve learning. London: Kogan Page.

Bottom of Form

Sisson, M., (2014). How do we begin to embed a coaching culture in our organizations? Strategic HR Review, 13(3), pp. 148-150.

Slingsby, H., (2009). Coaching the coach. Training Journal, , pp. 63-67.

Top of Form

Stack, L. (2013). Coaching and mentoring employees: Helping others achieve their very best. Place of publication not identified: Productivity Pro.

Bottom of Form

Yedreshteyn, S., (2008). A qualitative investigation of the implementation of an internal executive coaching program in a global corporation, grounded in organizational psychology theory, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology.

Top of Form

Work Foundation. (2003). Coaching and mentoring. London: Work Foundation.

Bottom of Form

More Services here