BMSW4002 Effective Teamwork Communication Essay - Essay Prowess

BMSW4002 Effective Teamwork Communication Essay

$5.90

Kindly Add to Cart and Buy the Answer at $5.99

Category:

BMSW4002 Effective TeamWork Communication

BMSW4002 Effective Teamwork Communication. Write a report of 2000 words, demonstrating your understanding of: 1) the three models of communication taught in class 2) the communication skills discussed, and 3) the advantages and disadvantages of technology in communication.

33

Programme:Certificate of Higher Education in Skills for the Workplace
Module:Effective TeamWork and Communication
Module code:BMSW4002Contribution to Overall Module Assessment (%):50%
Lecturer:Group 1 – Lloyd Beharry Group 2 – Lloyd Beharry Group 3 – Anita NanInternal Verifier:Sylvia Hoffmann
Assignment Title:Effective Team Work and Communication Assessment 1Word count (or equivalent):2000 words
Submission deadline:To be announced by the Assessment team Please refer to the assessments schedule published on Students’ Hall in MoodleReturn date of provisional marks & written feedback:20 working days after submission deadline
Submission method:All written assessments, where practical and possible, must be submitted via Turnitin unless otherwise instructed by the Lecturer. (Please DO NOT put this assessment specification into Turnitin or it will match many similarities with other students’ submissions.) Alternative submission method (if applicable): Late submission of the assessment will result in a late penalty mark. Penalties for late submission: Up to one week late, maximum mark of 40%. Over one week late, 0%. Only the Extenuating Circumstances Panel may approve a change to submission dates.
Academic honesty / referencing:Academic honesty is required. In the main body of your submission you must give credit to authors on whose research and ideas your work is based. Append to your submission a reference list that indicates the books, articles, etc. that you have used, cited or quoted in order to complete this assessment.
Module Learning Outcomes (from module syllabus)
  MODULE AIM   To introduce students to strategies for effective team working.   To develop students awareness of the range of communication skills integral to success within the workplace.   LEARNING OUTCOMES   Upon the successful completion of this module, the student will be able to:   Apply the main theories relating to group dynamics, team working and communication to their own workplace examples.   Prepare and deliver a short presentation within a team working context.

ASSESSMENT

Assessment – Component 1 (50%)

Mode of assessmentVolumeWeighting
Practical portfolio of set in-class exercises or equivalent (e.g. various communications such as emails, business letters / case study analysis / other evidence generated during classroom activities)    2000 words or equivalent    50%

Report (2000 words)

Write a report of 2000 words, demonstrating your understanding of:

  1. the three models of communication taught in class
  2. the communication skills discussed, and
  3. the advantages and disadvantages of technology in communication.

Refer to any case studies done to show how these helped your understanding and give examples of poor communication in your own or your friend’s workplace, and suggest how it could be improved by using your findings from published literature (i.e. refer to theory).

Text Box: GUIDANCE FOR STUDENTS IN THE COMPLETION OF TASKS

NOTE: The guidance offered below is linked to the five generic assessment criteria overleaf.

  1. Engagement with Literature Skills

Your work must be informed and supported by scholarly material that is relevant to and focused on the task(s) set. You should provide evidence that you have accessed an appropriate range of sources, which may be academic, governmental and industrial; these sources may include academic journal articles, textbooks, current news articles, organisational documents, and websites. You should consider the credibility of your sources; academic journals are normally highly credible sources while websites require careful consideration/selection and should be used sparingly. Any sources you use should be current and up-to- date, mostly published within the last five years or so, though seminal/important works in the field may be older. You must provide evidence of your research/own reading throughout your work, using a suitable referencing system, including in-text citations in the main body of your work and a reference list at the end of your work.

2.    Knowledge and Understanding Skills

At level 4, you should be able to demonstrate knowledge of the underlying concepts and principles associated with your area(s) of study. Knowledge relates to the facts, information and skills you have acquired through your learning. You demonstrate your understanding by interpreting the meaning of the facts and information (knowledge). This means that you need to select and include in your work the concepts, techniques, models, theories, etc. appropriate to the task(s) set. You should be able to explain the theories, concepts, etc. to show your understanding. Your mark/grade will also depend upon the extent to which you demonstrate your knowledge and understanding.

3.    Cognitive and Intellectual Skills

You should be able to present, evaluate and interpret qualitative and quantitative data, in order to develop lines of argument and make sound judgements in accordance with basic theories and concepts of your subject(s) of study. You should be able to evaluate the appropriateness of different approaches to solving problems related to your area(s) of study and/or work. Your work must contain evidence of logical, analytical thinking. For example, to examine and break information down into parts, make inferences, compile, compare and contrast information. This means not just describing what! But also justifying: Why? How? When? Who? Where? At what cost? You should provide justification for your arguments and judgements using evidence that you have reflected upon the ideas of others within the subject area and that you are able to make sound judgements and arguments using data and concepts. Where relevant, alternative solutions and recommendations may be proposed.

4.    Practical Skills

At level 4, you should be able to apply the basic underlying concepts and principles to evaluate and interpret these within the context of your area of study. You should be able to demonstrate how the subject-related concepts and ideas relate to real world situations and/or a particular context. How do they work in practice?

You will deploy models, methods, techniques, and/or theories, in that context, to assess current situations, perhaps to formulate plans or solutions to solve problems, or to create artefacts. This is likely to involve, for instance, the use of real world artefacts, examples and cases, the application of a model within an organisation and/or benchmarking one theory or organisation against others based on stated criteria.

5.    Transferable Skills for Life and Professional Practice

Your work must provide evidence of the qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility. This includes demonstrating: that you can communicate the results of your study/work accurately and reliably, and with structured and coherent arguments; that you can initiate and complete tasks and procedures, whether individually and/or collaboratively; fluency of expression; clarity and effectiveness in presentation and organisation. Work should be coherent and well-structured in presentation and organisation.

Text Box: STUDENT FEEDBACK FORM

This section details the extent to which the assessment criteria are demonstrated by you, which in turn determines your mark. The marks available for each category of skill are shown. Lecturers will use the space provided to comment on the achievement of the task(s), including those areas in which you have performed well and areas that would benefit from development/improvement.

  Generic Assessment CriteriaMarks available  Marks awarded
1. Engagement with Literature Skills .20 
   
2. Knowledge and Understanding Skills20 
   
3. Cognitive and Intellectual Skills20 
   
4. Practical Application Skills20 
   
5. Transferable Skills for Life and Professional Practice20 
   
Assessment Mark (Assessment marks are subject to ratification at the Exam Board. These comments and marks are to give feedback on module work and are for guidance only until they are confirmed. )Late Submission Penalties (tick if appropriate)  100%
Up to 1 week late (40% Max) 
Over 1 week late (0%) 
Text Box: GENERIC ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Level 4
In accordance with the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications, at the end of Level 4 students will be expected to have demonstrated knowledge of the basic underlying concepts and principles of a subject, and an ability to evaluate and interpret these within the context of that area of study. They should be able to present, evaluate and interpret qualitative and quantitative data in order to develop lines of argument and make sound judgements in accordance with basic theories and concepts of their subject(s) of study. They will have learned how to evaluate different approaches to solving problems, and will be able to communicate the results of their study/work accurately and reliably, and with structured and coherent arguments. They will be able to undertake further training and develop new skills within a structured and managed environment and will have the qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility.
Level 4FAILMARGINAL FAILSATISFACTORY (3rd / Pass)GOOD (2.2 / Pass)VERY GOOD (2.1 / Merit)EXCELLENT (1st / Distinction)EXCEPTIONAL (1st / Distinction)
Category0-29%30-39%40-49%50-59%60-69%70-84%85-100%
Engagement with literature (including reading, referencing, academic conventions and academic honesty)Little or no evidence of reading and/or reliance on inappropriate sources. Views and findings mostly unsupported and non- authoritative. Referencing conventions used incoherently or largely absent.Poor engagement with essential reading. No evidence of wider reading. Reliance on inappropriate sources, and/or indiscriminate use of sources. Heavily reliant on information gained through class contact. Inconsistent and weak use of referencing.Engagement with a limited range of mostly relevant and credible sources but with some reliance on information gained through class contact. Some omissions and minor errors. Referencing conventions evident though not always applied accurately or consistently.Engagement with an appropriate range of literature, including sources retrieved independently. Some over- reliance on texts rather than other sources. Referencing may show minor inaccuracies or inconsistencies.Engagement with a wide range of literature, including sources retrieved independently. Selection of relevant and credible sources. Generally sound referencing, with no/very few inaccuracies or inconsistencies.Engagement with an extensive range of relevant and credible literature. Consistently accurate application of referencing.Exceptional engagement with an extensive range of relevant and credible literature. High- level referencing skills consistently applied.
Knowledge and understanding (Knowledge of the basic underlying concepts andMajor gaps in knowledge and understanding of the basic underlying concepts andGaps in knowledge of the basic underlying concepts and principles, with flawed orLimited knowledge and understanding of the basic underlying concepts andKnowledge of the basic underlying concepts and principles is accurate with aCompetent knowledge of the basic underlying concepts and principles. Exhibits veryExcellent knowledge and understanding of the basic underlying concepts andExceptional, detailed knowledge and understanding of the basic underlying
Level 4FAILMARGINAL FAILSATISFACTORY (3rd / Pass)GOOD (2.2 / Pass)VERY GOOD (2.1 / Merit)EXCELLENT (1st / Distinction)EXCEPTIONAL (1st / Distinction)
Category0-29%30-39%40-49%50-59%60-69%70-84%85-100%
principles of a subject.)principles of the subject matter. Inclusion of irrelevant material. Substantial inaccuracies.superficial understanding. Some significant inaccuracies and/or irrelevant material.principles within the subject area. Some elements may be missing.good understanding of the field of study but lacks depth and/or breadth.good understanding.principles of the subject.concepts and principles
Cognitive and intellectual skills (Evaluate underlying concepts and principles of a subject and interpret qualitative and quantitative data in order to develop lines of argument and make sound judgements.)Wholly or almost wholly descriptive work. Little or no evaluation of the underlying concepts and principles. Failure to develop arguments, leading to illogical or invalid judgements. Minimal or no use of evidence to back up views.Largely descriptive work, with superficial evaluation of the underlying concepts and principles. Weak interpretation of data, flawed development of arguments and judgements. Information accepted uncritically, uses generalised statements made with scant evidence and unsubstantiated opinions. Ideas sometimes illogical and contradictory.Limited attempt at evaluation of the underlying concepts and principles, tending towards description. Can interpret qualitative and quantitative data but with some errors. Some evidence to support emerging arguments and judgements but these may be underdeveloped or with a little inconsistency / mis- interpretation.Good evaluation of the underlying concepts and principles. Can interpret qualitative and quantitative data, with minor errors. An emerging ability to use evidence to support the argument. Mostly valid arguments and logical judgements.Sound evaluation of the underlying concepts and principles. Can interpret qualitative and quantitative data accurately. Ability to devise arguments using evidence to make mostly appropriate and valid judgements.Excellent evaluation of the underlying concepts and principles. Can interpret qualitative and quantitative data accurately and with some insight. Excellent ability to devise arguments using evidence and make appropriate and valid judgements.Exceptional evaluation of the underlying concepts and principles based evidence. Outstanding interpretation of qualitative and quantitative data. Exceptional ability to devise arguments using evidence and make wholly appropriate and valid judgements.
Practical skills (Different approaches to solving problems in particular contexts.)Limited or no use of taught, basic methods, materials, tools and/or techniques. Little or no appreciation of the context of the application.Rudimentary application of taught, basic methods, materials, tools and/or techniques but without consideration andAn adequate awareness and mostly appropriate application of basic methods, materials, tools and/or techniques.A good and appropriate application of basic methods, materials, tools and/or techniques. Clear appreciation ofA very good application of a range of basic methods, materials, tools and/or techniques. Very good consideration of the context ofAn advanced application of a range of taught, basic methods, materials, tools and/or techniques. The context of the application isExceptional levels of application and deployment skills in particular practical contexts. Outstanding identification of
Level 4FAILMARGINAL FAILSATISFACTORY (3rd / Pass)GOOD (2.2 / Pass)VERY GOOD (2.1 / Merit)EXCELLENT (1st / Distinction)EXCEPTIONAL (1st / Distinction)
Category0-29%30-39%40-49%50-59%60-69%70-84%85-100%
 Very weak evidence of different approaches to problem-solving in particular contexts.competence. Flawed appreciation of the context of the application. Weak evidence of different approaches to problem-solving in particular contexts.Basic appreciation of the context of the application. Can identify problems in particular contexts and propose basic alternative approaches or solutions though there may be errors.the context of the application. Good evidence of different approaches to problem-solving in particular contexts and proposes mostly appropriate solutions.the application. Very good evidence of different approaches to problem-solving in particular contexts and proposes appropriate solutions.well considered, and insightful. Excellent evidence of different approaches to problem-solving in particular contexts and proposes appropriate solutions.problems in particular contexts and formulation of wholly appropriate, thoughtful solutions / different approaches.
Transferable skills for life and professional practice (Communicate the results of their study/work accurately and reliably, and with structured and coherent arguments; the qualities needed for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility within a structured and managed environment.)Work is poorly structured, disorganised, inaccurate and/or confusingly expressed. Very weak use of language and/or very inappropriate style. Failure to work effectively individual or as part of a group. Little or no evidence of the skills for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility.Work is poorly presented in a disjointed manner. It is loosely, and at times incoherently, structured, with information and ideas often poorly expressed. Weak use of language and/or inappropriate style. Flawed approach to individual or group work, meeting only partial obligations to others. Limited evidence of the skills for employment requiring theMostly ordered presentation and structure in which relevant ideas / concepts are reasonably expressed. Work may lack coherence and/or accuracy in places. Can work as part of a group, meeting most obligations to others but perhaps with limited involvement in group activities. Demonstrates the basic skills for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility, with some areasMostly coherent, organised and accurate work, in a suitable structure and is for the most part clearly expressed. Can work effectively independently and/or as part of a team, with clear contribution to group activities. Demonstrates the skills for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility, with some areas of strength and some of minor weakness.Work is accurate, coherent, fluent, well-structured and organised. Can work effectively independently and/or as part of a team, with very good contribution to group activities. Demonstrates very good skills for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility, with just occasional minor weakness.Work is coherent, very fluent and is presented professionally. Can work effectively independently and/or as part of a team, with an excellent contribution to group activities. Demonstrates excellent skills for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility with an appetite for further development.Work is accurate, exceptionally coherent, very fluent and presented well. Can work effectively independently and/or as part of a team, with an exceptional contribution to group activities. Demonstrates exceptional skills for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility with an appetite for further development.
Level 4FAILMARGINAL FAILSATISFACTORY (3rd / Pass)GOOD (2.2 / Pass)VERY GOOD (2.1 / Merit)EXCELLENT (1st / Distinction)EXCEPTIONAL (1st / Distinction)
Category0-29%30-39%40-49%50-59%60-69%70-84%85-100%
  exercise of some personal responsibility.of minor weakness.    
BMSW4002 Effective Teamwork and Communication

Order your Copy Today

Our Services Our services Our services Our Services
Custom Research Papers
Sample papers
Custom Term Paper
Descriptive Essays
Dissertation Abstract
Dissertation Help
Dissertation Proposal
Dissertation Topic
Dissertation Writers
Dissertation Writing Service
Do My Essay
Do My Essay For Me
Do My Paper
Doctoral Dissertation
Editing  Writing
Essay Help
Essay Outline
Essay Topics
Essay writers
APA style
Plagiarism Checker
gantt maker
Essay Editing Services
Essay questions
Buy Essays Online
Buy Term Paper Online
Write My Essay
Do my homework for me
Academic papers
Admission Essay Writing
APA Style Paper
Assignment Services
Book Review
Business Essay
Business Report
Buy custom essay
Case Study Services
Cheap essays
Cheap Research papers
Chicago Style Papers
Essay Writing Service
Capstone Project 
Citation Generator
Buy Term Paper Online
Literary analysis essay
Application essay writing
Argumentative essay
Cause and effect essays
Compare and Contrast essay
Critical Analysis Essay
Article critique
Assignment help
Biology paper
Buy college papers
Buy Dissertations
Buy Essays online
Buy projects
College Essays
College papers
College Term Papers
Essays for Sale
GCSE coursework
Research Papers
Research paper topics 
Term Paper Writing
Definition essay
Descriptive essay
Expository essay
Five paragraph essay
Narrative Essay
Personal Essay writing
Scholarship Essay
Reports 
Powerpoint
Economic Essay
Buy Essay
Online Writing Services
Buy Cheap Essays
Coursework Help
Course Work Writing
Critical Essay Writing
Custom Essay
Free Essays
Free Term Papers
Grammarly Checker
Turnitin plagiarism checker
error: Content is protected !!