$25.99 $5.99
Kindly ADD to CART and Purchase the Full Answer at $5.99 ONLY.
Assignment Brief |
You are to submit one portfolio of evidence for the whole group, which demonstrates the management of your client project.
The evidence you must include is prescribed by the separate proformas, see document entitled BM562 Proformas for CW1 Portfolio 2022-23 You must provide supporting evidence as far as possible for each section. All contributing students’ names and student ID numbers must be on the front cover. If a student’s identifying details are missing, they will not be awarded a grade. One of the sections is the final Client Report. This should be 2500 words long +/- 10%. You must ensure that your Client receives a copy of this. There is no designated word count for the other elements of the portfolio, however these should still be professionally and carefully written and presented.
WORKING IN GROUPS All team members must participate in the development of the portfolio. As 20% of the mark for this coursework will come from the client’s rating for each individual, final marks may vary between team members. |
1 Internal Moderator: Chris Parsons 09.12.21
As regards the other 80%, your work will be marked as a group and all members will receive the same mark, unless there is clear evidence of a difference in contribution.
Please see the separate ‘Group Work Policy Statement’ for more information. |
|
This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes: | |
1. | Apply an evaluative approach to a range of practical business data, and sources of information for |
delivery of the project. | |
2. | Perform efficiently and effectively as a collaborative member of a working group and as an added |
value contributor to the organisation which is assigned to the students. | |
3. | Deliver innovative solutions to the client’s problems together with recommendations for measuring |
and evaluating those solutions. | |
4. | Demonstrate effective business communication skills. |
Task requirements | |
The Client Report element of the portfolio should use line and a half spacing. This element of the work should be 2500 words long +/- 10%. The list of references will not be included in the word count. |
|
Referencing and research requirements | |
Please reference your work according to the Harvard Referencing style as defined in Cite Them Right Online (http://www.citethemrightonline.com). This information is also available in book form: Pears, R. and Shields, G. (2016) Cite them right: the essential reference guide. 10th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Copies are available via the university library.
The Cite Them Right database can be accessed via the Library – A to Z list of e resources. |
|
How your work will be assessed | |
Your work will be assessed using the separate assessment grid, which takes into account the learning outcomes and the grading descriptors for your Level. | |
Submission details |
Before you submit |
Please use the checklist below to make sure you are ‘fit to submit’ your work
We recommend you use this checklist as soon as you get this assignment brief to help you plan your work. |
Fit to Submit: Assignment Checklist |
This brief assignment checklist is designed to help you avoid some of the most common mistakes students make in their coursework. HAVE YOU READ THE ASSIGNMENT BRIEF? IF NOT, DO IT NOW! In it you will find details of the assessment task, word count, the assessment criteria your work is marked against, and the learning outcomes – the basis for the assessment strategy in each module.
Students often lose marks by forgetting some of the more straightforward elements of their assignments. We recommend that you “tick off” each of the points below as you prepare your work for submission. If you need any help, ask your tutor and / or visit https://bucks.ac.uk/students/academicadvice/assessment-and-examination
See Assignment Checklist below
TICK
Have you read and understood the assessment criteria? Have you met the learning outcomes? You will lose marks and your work may even be failed if you have not. |
Have you demonstrated you can think and write critically in the completed work? This means you have supported your arguments/explanations appropriately e.g.
using relevant academic sources and you have offered discussion points which extends your own or others’ viewpoints to make reasoned conclusions/judgements. Have you maintained an academic tone throughout your work? Is your work formal, focused, developed and clear? Have you checked that the referencing in your assignment is in line with your programme requirements? Have you proof-read your work and used spellcheck software to check your spelling and grammar? Have you checked the presentation of your work is as specified by your tutor, for example, are font size, colour, style, line spacing and margins as the tutor specified? Have you kept to the word count (or equivalent)? If you are not sure, check with your tutor. Can you confirm that the work submitted is your own and not plagiarised? |
Assessment Grid for BM562 CW1 Career Research Report
80-100 (A+)
Pass |
70-79 (A)
Pass |
60-69 (B)
Pass |
50-59 (C)
Pass |
40-49 (D)
Pass |
35-39 E –
Marginal fail |
0-34 (F) –
Fail |
||
Criteria | Weig hting | Outstanding | Excellent | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | Below required standard | Not successful |
Transferable Skills | Demonstrates an
exceptional ability to |
Demonstrates a highly
accomplished ability to |
Demonstrates a highly
proficient ability to |
Demonstrates a
consistent and confident |
Demonstrates a
sufficient ability to |
Demonstrates an
insufficient ability to |
Demonstrates limited
or no ability to |
|
This should include evidence of: |
20 | communicate ideas and
information accurately and |
communicate ideas and
information accurately and |
communicate ideas
and information |
ability to communicate
ideas and information |
communicate ideas and
information accurately |
communicate ideas
and information |
communicate ideas
and information |
· Accurate spelling, | reliably in written
academic English, |
reliably in written
academic English, |
accurately and reliably
in written academic |
accurately and reliably in
written academic |
and reliably in written
academic English, |
accurately and
reliably in written |
accurately and reliably
in written academic |
|
punctuation and grammar
· Completing all of the |
throughout the project. This will include evidence | throughout the project. This will include evidence | English, throughout the project. This will | English, throughout the project. This will include | throughout the project. This will include | academic English, throughout the | English, throughout the project. This will | |
assignment tasks
· Appropriate language use · Appropriate report writing |
from email trails, minutes of meetings, as well as the
final client report |
from email trails, minutes of meetings, as well as the
final client report |
include evidence from email trails, minutes
of meetings, as well as |
evidence from email trails, minutes of
meetings, as well as the |
evidence from email trails, minutes of
meetings, as well as the |
project. This will include evidence
from email trails, |
include evidence from email trails, minutes
of meetings, as well as |
|
conventions
· Client and supervisor liaison · Accurate Harvard referencing |
the final client report | final client report | final client report | minutes of
meetings, as well as the final client |
the final client report | |||
report | ||||||||
Application and Practice
Organisation/ Project management/ Team management |
20 | The portfolio is exceptionally well organised and structured. There is an exceptional degree of accuracy and detail in the project plans and progress reports, together with minutes of all meetings, suggesting team work and project management at an exceptionally accomplished level. | The portfolio is organised and structured in a highly accomplished manner. There is a high degree of accuracy and detail in the project plans and progress reports, together with minutes of all meetings, suggesting team work and project management at a highly accomplished level. | The portfolio is organised and structured in a capable and effective manner. The accuracy and detail in the project plans and progress reports, together with minutes of all
meetings, suggest capable and effective team work and project management. |
The portfolio is organised and structured in a consistent and informed manner. The accuracy and detail in the project plans and progress reports, together with minutes of all meetings, suggest consistent and effective team work and project management. | The portfolio is organised and structured to sufficient ability levels of ability. The accuracy and detail in the project plans and progress reports, together with minutes of all meetings, suggest predominantly efficient team work and project management. | The portfolio is organised and structured in an insufficient manner. There is a partial degree of accuracy and detail with gaps in the project plans and progress reports with some findings unclear and not effective. Evidence of team work and project management ineffective or inefficient. | The organisation and structure of the portfolio is of limited ability. There is inaccurate detail and gaps in the project plans and progress reports with findings unclear and not effective suggesting ineffective and inefficient evidence of team work and project management |
Knowledge and Understanding | 20 | Evidence of exceptional background research into the client’s business problem. Evidenced through exceptional range and extensive references to source data (academic and secondary) and through any primary research effort.
Exceptional knowledge and critical understanding of the client’s industry as well as specific business problem |
Evidence of highly accomplished levels of background research into the client’s business problem. Evidenced through a wide range of references to source data (academic and secondary) and through any primary research effort.
Highly accomplished knowledge and critical understanding of the client’s industry as well as specific business problem |
Evidence of refined background research into the client’s business problem. Evidenced through a wide and some independently select references to source data (academic and secondary) and through any primary research effort.
Refined knowledge and critical understanding of the client’s industry as well as specific business problem |
A sound background research into the client’s business problem. Wider reading is largely limited to core texts but has clearly enhanced the work using references to source data (academic and secondary) and through any primary research effort.
Sound breadth and depth of knowledge and critical understanding of the client’s industry as well as specific business problem |
A basic background research into the client’s business problem.
Wider reading is largely restricted to core texts and only partially integrated in terms of references to source data (academic and secondary) and through any primary research effort.
Basic knowledge and critical understanding of the client’s industry as well as specific business problem |
Insufficient demonstration of the background research into the client’s business problem. There is limited evidence of wider reading and or wider reading lacks relevance in terms of references to source data (academic and secondary) and also limited primary research effort.
Insufficient knowledge and critical understanding of the client’s industry as well as specific business problem |
Limited and / or substantially inaccurate demonstration of background research into the client’s business problem.
There is little or no evidence of wider reading to source data (academic and secondary) and / or limited to no primary research effort.
Limited and / or substantially inaccurate demonstration of the knowledge and critical understanding of the client’s industry as well as specific business problem |
Analysis and Criticality | 20 | Team demonstrates exceptionally | Team demonstrates highly accomplished levels of | Team is able to evaluate the options | Team demonstrates a well-developed ability to | Team demonstrates a sufficient ability for the | Team demonstrates an insufficient | Team demonstrates a limited or no ability to |
accomplished levels of | critical evaluation of the | available to solving | develop some options to | client but are very | ability to fully | understand the | ||
critical evaluation of the | process. Team really acts | the client’s problem to | solving the problem but | dependent on the | understand the | client’s problem and | ||
process. Team really acts | as a consultancy team and | a sophisticated level | the rationale for the | client’s lead. Team | client’s problem and | limited or no solutions | ||
as a consultancy team and | offers real value to the | of ability. Useful and | solutions offered could | becomes part of the | insufficient | are offered to the | ||
offers real value to the | client in terms of their | relevant solutions | be articulated more | work force carrying out | solutions are | client. | ||
client in terms of their | suggested solutions and | offered although a | clearly and more closely | tasks rather than | offered to the client. | |||
suggested solutions and | work carried out. Highly | little more might be | linked to the research | critically evaluating the | ||||
work carried out. | accomplished and clear | provided in terms of | undertaken. | situation and offering | ||||
Exceptionally | rationale for solutions | justification for them. | added value. Solutions | |||||
accomplished and clear | offered. | offered do not fully | ||||||
rationale for solutions | address the client’s | |||||||
offered. | needs. | |||||||
Client Reference | 20 | Clients will give each student in the group a mark out of 10. So that we can give you a final mark out of 100 for your portfolio, we will double this.
Your portfolio mark is then weighted at 80% of your overall module mark. |